The first stamps of British Guiana were locally designed and produced in 1850, so it became the fourth British Colony to issue its own stamps. It had been decided that the very basic inland post (mainly serving sugar plantations) needed upgrading to a daily service, with the charges being pre-paid by means of postage stamps. There was insufficient time before the planned issue date to order stamps from London, so they were ordered from the local printers of the Royal Gazette. Different values were required to reflect the distances and charges involved, with the denominations being 4ct, 8ct and 12ct (a 2ct for local delivery in Georgetown was introduced in the following year).
The Williams brothers described the issue as ‘The crudest classic issue by a government Post Office in what used to be called the British Empire’. They were produced on variable-quality paper by the simplest of methods, were scribbled on as a matter of course and are, indeed, crude. The French have an expression which well describes their appeal, which has passed into English; jolie-laide (literally, ‘pretty-ugly’). To justify the use of the expression, they are attractive despite their crudity, in the same way as some of the Indian States local printings, and have long been celebrated for their rarity and ephemeral charm.
E.T.E. Dalton was the Deputy Postmaster of Demerara and was responsible for issuing the official notice announcing the issue. However, when he saw the stamps prior to their issue, he was very aware of their lack of sophistication and felt that some additional form of security was necessary (“As they could be imitated in any printing office, I was obliged to counter-sign them. They were of the most ordinary workmanship...”) The decision was taken that each stamp should be initialed by a postal official as an additional protection against forgery.
The stamps were produced to a very simple design, with the values in italics in the centre of the stamps and BRITISH/GUIANA around the edge inside a circle, which was made from printer’s brass rules bent to shape. The stamps were printed in black on differently-coloured papers to ensure easy recognition of the values; the 2ct on rose, the 4ct on shades of orange and yellow, the 8ct on green and the 12ct on blue (shades to indigo). While the sheet format is not known, it seems likely that the stamps were printed in rows of four, one each of four types, at least two rows to a sheet. The largest vertical multiple is a pair (necessarily of the same type), so it may well be that the sheets were composed simply of two rows of four.
Only two examples of unused ‘Cotton-Reels’ have been recorded, and one of them disappeared after its sale in a Harmer Rooke auction of 1935; the other surfaced in the John E. du Pont sale in 2014. Both are 12ct values. The 12ct also boasts two varieties, one showing a straight foot to the ‘2’ of ‘12’, the normal foot being curved. Few are known. Even rarer (and currently catalogued at £250,000) is the variety with the ‘1’ of ‘12’ omitted; just one example is recorded.
Only two examples of unused ‘Cotton-Reels’ have been recorded, and one of them disappeared after its sale in a Harmer Rooke auction of 1935; the other surfaced in the John E. du Pont sale in 2014
The rarity of the stamps was not generally appreciated for some twenty years or so after their issue, and as late as 1882 SG’s catalogue price for the 8ct was 40/- (it is £16,000 now!) Stanley Gibbons himself bought a parcel containing three to four hundred Cotton-Reels; mostly the 12ct, ‘some scores’ of the 4ct, a few 8ct but no 2ct stamps at all. There are a mere ten examples of the 2ct known, including two remarkable and justly famous covers, each bearing a pair; the addressees being “Miss Rose, Blankenburg” and “Edward Gordon, Plantn. Good Hope”. Just two single examples are available to collectors.
The condition of classic stamps is often an issue. Experienced dealers and collectors know what to look for – repaired or recut margins, added corners, thins, rebacking, painted surface faults and the like. The ‘Cotton-Reels’ are even more susceptible to such faults than most classics, partly because the paper used for the printing was so variable; according to David MacDonnell, ‘ranging from thick stout rough wove, to medium rough wove, to hard or soft thin pelure.’ The paper was often not strong, and easily torn. Faults such as thinnings or surface cracks must be considered to be the norm. Being of a round design, they were usually cut round and close to the circular frame; examples which are cut square are rare, and fine examples cut square are altogether exceptional. In addition, the stamps appear to have been ungummed, probably sensibly, in the light of the local climate. Most were therefore affixed to letters by whatever means came to hand, mostly with glue, but some with wafers or even sealing wax. Thus attempts to remove stamps from letters, or portions thereof, often met with limited success and frequently damaged them. The usual considerations of condition cannot be applied here.
In conclusion, the Cotton-Reels represent a unique part of British Colonial philately. They have graced the finest collections; The Royal Collection, Tapling, Ferrary, Burrus, King Farouk, du Pont and others. Despite their apparently unprepossessing appearance, they are redolent with history, and continue to fascinate sophisticated collectors today.
Manage, view and value your stamps online
Catch up with the latest philatelic news while on the go
Enjoy thousands of items, create custom searches bespoke to you, add to your wishlist and stamp collection from any computer, anywhere!Register today Already have an account? Sign in
For the benefit of all website users, we have launched the function of single sign-on. One single password will now be valid across all of our platforms, including:
Now you will only ever need to sign in once.
If you're trying to access your account for the first time since the update, your old password will no longer work.
You'll need to set a new password using the Forgot Password page. Click the button below and follow the instructions provided.Reset my password